Writing and rewriting in the university environment as a responsive process
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4013/cld.2024.215.01Keywords:
university writing, academic abstract, Feedbacks.Abstract
This article aims to investigate how the processes of guided writing and rewriting (feedbacks) contribute to the development of responsive writing. The main problem that triggers our interest in this research comes from a disagreement with the reproduction of the discourse that university students "write badly / are illiterate" or that they would not be prepared to be in Higher Education. Thus, affiliated with the theoretical assumptions of Bakhtin (2011) and his Circle (Volóchinov, 2018), we consider language as a form of interaction, and statements/discourses, from the perspective of dialogism and crossed by sociocultural and ideological aspects. Thus, it is a field research with a qualitative approach in Applied Linguistics (Moita Lopes, 2006), starts from a social perspective of literacy and is based on the theoretical assumptions of the New Literacy Studies (Street, 2014 and others), consolidated in the 1990s. The results indicated that feedback is an important strategy, as it allows students to reflect on their actions and act responsibly in order to obtain a more meaningful learning in textual production.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
I grant the journal Calidoscópio the first publication of my article, licensed under Creative Commons Attribution license (which allows sharing of work, recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal).
I confirm that my article is not being submitted to another publication and has not been published in its entirely on another journal. I take full responsibility for its originality and I will also claim responsibility for charges from claims by third parties concerning the authorship of the article.
I also agree that the manuscript will be submitted according to the journal’s publication rules described above.