Martha Nussbaum and Literature as Moral Philosophy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4013/fsu.2021.222.02Abstract
Martha Nussbaum claims that literature can be moral philosophy. This thesis, not so popular among philosophers, has been the target of different attacks. One of the most fundamental objections to the thesis is that literature do not do some traditional philosophic work. Specifically, it is said that philosophy does systematic conceptual work, and that philosophy shows truths by arguing. This paper claims that literature can indeed do systematic work and argue. Therefore, a literary work can be, at the same time, a philosophical work; more precisely, it can be moral philosophy. The main argument for this is based on two ideas inspired by Wittgenstein’s work. First, that a way of systematize is to offer a panoramic view that illuminates the problem field. Second, that there are some truths, particularly moral truths, that language cannot grasp, but can show.
Keywords: Ethics, philosophy, literature, morality, Nussbaum, Wittgenstein.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Filosofia Unisinos

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
I grant the Filosofia Unisinos – Unisinos Journal of Philosophy the first publication of my article, licensed under Creative Commons Attribution license 4.0 (which allows sharing of work, recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal).
I confirm that my article is not being submitted to another publication and has not been published in its entirely on another journal. I take full responsibility for its originality and I will also claim responsibility for charges from claims by third parties concerning the authorship of the article.