Hegel e a apercepção pura transcendental de Kant
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4013/con.2022.18.1.02Keywords:
Hegel. Kant. Apercepção Pura Transcendental.Abstract
In this article I address the issue of Hegel's interpretation of the concept of pure transcendental apperception in Kant. For that, I debate with the position of Robert Pippin, who affirms that Hegel takes the kantian transcendental point of view, according to which self-awareness bases the knowledge of objects. In my view, Hegel initially makes a positive analysis of the kantian argument about apperception, agreeing with Kant about the unity and the thinking and self-referential character of the self. However, Hegel strongly criticizes Kant for considering self-awareness only from a subjective point of view, in an external relationship with the object. In this sense, I will try to show some points that I consider wrong in Pippin's reading of the hegelian interpretation of the kantian concept of pure apperception. Furthermore, I think that Hegel incorporates into his Logic what he conceives as a speculative element within the kantian argument about pure transcendental apperception, thus transforming Kant's understanding of the I think into his logical-speculative conception of the concept.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
I grant the journal Controvérsia the first publication of my article, licensed under Creative Commons Attribution license (which allows sharing of work, recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal).
I confirm that my article is not being submitted to another publication and has not been published in its entirely on another journal. I take full responsibility for its originality and I will also claim responsibility for charges from claims by third parties concerning the authorship of the article.
I also agree that the manuscript will be submitted according to the journal’s publication rules described above.