Rhetoric and parrhesia in the democratic context
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4013/rechtd.2016.83.05Abstract
This article aims to understand the harmful role that rhetoric has in a democracy according to Plato. Therefore, the role of the character Callicles and sophistry in the Platonic dialogue Gorgias will be examined. This research will be structured as follows: presentation of some general topics about Platonic philosophy (rejection of sophistry and construction of objective knowledge); analysis of the dialog’s frame; analysis of the role of the character Callicles. Then, it will discuss the harm caused by rhetoric to democracy, but still as a widely used “practice”, since a true discourse (parrhesia), which is not convincing, does not have persuasive force to win over the demos (people), in other words, it is ineffective.
Keywords: democracy, rhetoric, parrhesia.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
I grant the journal RECHTD the first publication of my article, licensed under Creative Commons Attribution license (which allows sharing of work, recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal).
I confirm that my article is not being submitted to another publication and has not been published in its entirely on another journal. I take full responsibility for its originality and I will also claim responsibility for charges from claims by third parties concerning the authorship of the article.
I also agree that the manuscript will be submitted according to the journal’s publication rules described above.