Induction, deduction and inference to the best explanation
Abstract
Starting from the concept of abduction coined by Pierce, Harman, Josephson and Psillos have recently claimed that inference to the best explanation is the scientific method par excellence and favour a realist conception of scientific theories. In this paper, I evaluate some of the arguments proposed by those philosophers in order to show that inference to the best explanation overcomes some difficulties faced by enumerative induction and the hypothetical-deductive method, concluding that such arguments have some relevant deficiencies.
Key words: abduction, hypothetical deductivism, induction, inference to the best explanation, scientific realism.Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
I grant the Filosofia Unisinos – Unisinos Journal of Philosophy the first publication of my article, licensed under Creative Commons Attribution license 4.0 (which allows sharing of work, recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal).
I confirm that my article is not being submitted to another publication and has not been published in its entirely on another journal. I take full responsibility for its originality and I will also claim responsibility for charges from claims by third parties concerning the authorship of the article.