Free will and responsibility
Abstract
The focal concern of this article is to verify the consistence of Schopenhauer´s account of moral and juridical imputation, which requires the presupposition of Kant´s conception of transcedental liberty. Schopenhauer´s view of responsibility and moral consciousness grounds on the basis of Kant´s concept of intelligible character as much on the equivocal of the term “action” (Tat) as Kant point it out in the Religion within the bounds of mere Reason. The main consequence of my interpretation is that Schopenhauer´s theory only makes sense under the assumption of a fundamental concept provided from his greatest adversary.
Key words: character, interpretation, responsibility, morality, ethics.Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
I grant the Filosofia Unisinos – Unisinos Journal of Philosophy the first publication of my article, licensed under Creative Commons Attribution license 4.0 (which allows sharing of work, recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal).
I confirm that my article is not being submitted to another publication and has not been published in its entirely on another journal. I take full responsibility for its originality and I will also claim responsibility for charges from claims by third parties concerning the authorship of the article.