If we suffer for love, it’s Plato’s fault:
a critical reading of the Symposium
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4013/fsu.2025.262.04Keywords:
psychophysical dualism, metaphysical thought, affectivity, love, desire, Michel Onfray.Abstract
The present text has as its initial objective to weave a critical reading of Plato’s well-known dialogue, The Symposium, reflecting on the conceptions of love, sexuality and affectivity that this text presents and the way in which such conceptions penetrated and developed in the western culture. This critique will be made from a post-modern perspective, based on Michel Onfray’s Théorie du corps amoureux, as well as some fragments from Nietzsche that underlie this author’s thinking, among other references that prove to be opportune. For this, the text will be divided into three distinct parts, the first reconstructing in general terms the arguments of Plato’s text, the second pointing out the weaknesses of these classical conceptions and the third directing the reader to the alternatives available in contemporary times through so many transformations in the forms of living, thinking and loving that we find at the beginning of the 21st century.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Francisco Fianco

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
I grant the Filosofia Unisinos – Unisinos Journal of Philosophy the first publication of my article, licensed under Creative Commons Attribution license 4.0 (which allows sharing of work, recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal).
I confirm that my article is not being submitted to another publication and has not been published in its entirely on another journal. I take full responsibility for its originality and I will also claim responsibility for charges from claims by third parties concerning the authorship of the article.