Between the normative and the immanent:
notes on Axel Honneth’s theory of justice
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4013/fsu.2024.252.07%20Keywords:
normative, immanent, theory of justice, Axel Honneth.Abstract
The article proposes to verify if it is possible to derive a theory of justice in Axel Honneth’s thought. For this the question that guides this text is: how to normatively and socially ground a theory of justice in Axel Honneth’s thought? The thesis to be defended is that it is possible to derive a theory of the experience of injustice from Honneth's thought, since his theoretical development allows us to identify experiences of non-recognition that lead to the development of social struggles. Therefore, we intend to show how there is a normative insufficiency in the philosopher’s theory here analyzed. In order to achieve this objective, we propose to follow this path: we will star by making a brief resumption of Honneth’s argumentative path, then we will to analyze the normative referrals proposed by the philosopher, to in the third moment think about justice as a relational greatness, at that moment bringing Rainer Forst’s theory into the discussion. In the fourth moment we propose to think about the role of law in Honneth’s thought. We will finalize with the presentation of our final considerations proposing that Honneth develops a theory of experiences of injustices.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Odair Camati

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
I grant the Filosofia Unisinos – Unisinos Journal of Philosophy the first publication of my article, licensed under Creative Commons Attribution license 4.0 (which allows sharing of work, recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal).
I confirm that my article is not being submitted to another publication and has not been published in its entirely on another journal. I take full responsibility for its originality and I will also claim responsibility for charges from claims by third parties concerning the authorship of the article.