Emenda Constitucional Inconstitucional e Reedição: Regras, Escolhas e Consequências
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4013/rechtd.2026.181.04Resumo
In contemporary comparative constitutional studies, one of the most intriguing questions is: is it possible to declare a constitutional amendment unconstitutional? If so, by whom and by what standards? This research investigates unconstitutional constitutional amendments and re-enactments, the choices, rules and consequences that follow. A doctrinal research method is used through secondary legal data in descriptive and prescriptive approaches. In this research, I make a holistic study of three constitutional amendments - successful and unsuccessful amendments in The Gambia, Kenya and Israel - as new questions and use them to draw a conclusion. The formal rules of constitutional amendment are the decisive mechanisms for constitutional enclosure, but constitutional re-enactments tend to deviate from their assumptions and are not aligned with their basic structure, thus destroying the continuity of the legal order. A constitution must be a constitution that responds to the changing society, because there has been a noticeable shift in the overall constitutional debate away from a normative or institutionalist perspective and toward a more analytical and comparative approach in assessing the configuration of constitutional processes. Therefore, changing a significant provision of a constitution that has a direct effect on the status of a state, taking the people out of the basket of progressive realization of a state, is a non sequitur under the rules of constitutional amendment.
Referências
ALBERT, R. 2010. Constitutional Handcuffs. Arizona State Law Journal, 42:663-715.
_____. 2014a. Constitutional Disuse or Desuetude: The Case of Article V. Boston University Law Review, 94:1030–1081.
_____. 2014b. The Structure of Constitutional Amendment Rule. Wake Forest Law Review, 49:913–975.
_____. 2015a. Amending constitutional amendment rules. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 13(3):655–685. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mov040
_____. 2015b. Amending constitutional amendment rules. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 13(3):655–685. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mov040
_____. 2017. Four Unconstitutional Constitutions and their Democratic Foundations. Cornell International Law Journal, 50(2):169–198.
_____. 2018. Constitutional Amendment and Dismemberment. The Yale Journal of International Law, 43:1-84.
_____. 2019. Constitutional Amendments: Making, Breaking, and Changing Constitutions. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
DIXON, R. 2011. Constitutional amendment rules: a comparative perspective. In: R. Dixon, T. Ginsburg (Eds.), Comparative Constitutional Law. Cheltenham, Edward Elgar Publishing.
DIXON, R.; HOLDEN, R. T. 2011. Constitutional Amendment Rules: The Denominator Problem. University of Chicago Public Law & Legal Theory Paper, 346:1-31.
DIXON, R.; LANDAU, D. 2015. Transnational constitutionalism and a limited doctrine of unconstitutional constitutional amendment. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 13(3):606–638. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mov039
DIXON, R.; LANDAU, D. 2018. Tiered Constitutional Design. The George Washington Law Review, 86(2):438–512.
DIXON, R.; UHLMANN, F. 2018. The Swiss Constitution and a weak-form unconstitutional amendment doctrine? International Journal of Constitutional Law, 16(1):54–74. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moy004
FARINACCI-FERNÓS, J. M. 2020. The constitution is dead, long live the constitution! The creation, endurance, and modification of modern revolutionary consti y constitutions. Barry Law Review, 25(1):35–55.
FOMBAD, C. M. 2011. Constitutional Reforms and Constitutionalism in Africa: Reflections on Some Current Challenges and Future Prospects. Buffalo Law Review, 59(4):1007–1108.
FOMBAD, C. M. 2013. Some perspectives on durability and change under modern African constitutions. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 11(2):382–413. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mot001
GINSBURG, T. 2008. The Global Spread of Constitutional Review. In: K. Whittington, D. Keleman (Eds.), Oxford handbook of Law and Politics. Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 81–98.
GINSBURG, T.; ABEBE, A. K.; DIXON, R. 2022. Constitutional amendment and term limit evasion in Africa. In: Democratic constitutional transitions in sub-Saharan Africa. Cheltenham, Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 40–57. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781839106897.00009
HAREL, A. 2023. Why the Israeli Constitutional Putsch is Unconstitutional. Zeitschrift Für Kritik - Recht - Gesellschaft, 2023(2):158–166. https://doi.org/10.33196/juridikum202302015801
HEIN, M. 2019. Impeding constitutional amendments: why are entrenchment clauses codified in contemporary constitutions? Acta Politica, 54(2):196–224. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41269-018-0082-4
LANDAU, D. 2018. Presidential Term Limits in Latin America: A Critical Analysis of the Migration of the Unconstitutional Constitutional Amendment Doctrine. The Law & Ethics of Human Rights, 12(2), 225–249. https://doi.org/10.1515/lehr-2018-0013
LUTZ, D. S. 1994. Towards a theory of Constitutional Amendment. The American Political Science Review, 88(2), 355–370.
MACFARLANE, E. 2022. The Unconstitutionality of Unconstitutional Constitutional Amendments. Manitoba Law Journal, 45(1):198–218.
MEDINA, B.; BLOCH, O. 2023. The Two Revolutions of Israel’s National Identity. Israel Law Review, 56(3):305–319. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021223723000225
MENDY, O. 2024. Influence of United States Constitutional System on Asian Countries. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences (JHASS), 6(1):39–47. https://doi.org/10.36079/lamintang.jhass-0601.614
POLZIN, M. 2021. The basic-structure doctrine and its German and French origins: a tale of migration, integration, invention and forgetting. Indian Law Review, 5(1):45–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/24730580.2020.1866882
ROZNAI, Y. 2013a. Unconstitutional Constitutional Amendments: The Migration and Success of a Constitutional Idea. The American Journal of Comparative Law, 61(3):657–719.
_____. 2013b. Unconstitutional Constitutional Amendments—The Migration and Success of a Constitutional Idea. American Journal of Comparative Law, 61(3):657–719. https://doi.org/10.5131/AJCL.2012.0027
_____. 2021. Why There? Explanatory Theories and Institutional Features Behind Unconstitutional Constitutional Amendments in Asia. In: R. Abeyratne, Bùi Ngoc Son (Eds.), The Law and Politics of Unconstitutional Constitutional Amendment in Asia. London, Routledge, pp. 273–295.
_____. 2023. We the Limited People? On the People as a Constitutional Organ in Constitutional Amendment. Supreme Court Law Review, 1110:103–123.
ROZNAI, Y.; COHEN, A. 2023. Populist Constitutionalism and the Judicial Overhaul in Israel. Israel Law Review, 56(3), 502–520. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021223723000201
ROZNAI, Y.; OKUBASU, D. M. 2023. Stability of constitutional structures and identity amidst ‘political settlement’: lessons from Kenya and Israel. Comparative Constitutional Studies, 1(1):101–123. https://doi.org/10.4337/ccs.2023.0017
SADOWSKI, P. 2023. Israel: In Search of Constitutional Common Sense. Review of European and Comparative Law, 55(4):243–260. https://doi.org/10.31743/recl.16742
SCOTTI, V. R. 2020. Constitutional dismemberment via referenda: a comparative overview. Revista de Investigações Constitucionais, 7(3):795–811. https://doi.org/10.5380/rinc.v7i3.74334
SUTEU, S. 2021. Introduction. In: Eternity Clauses in Democratic Constitutionalism. Oxford, Oxford University Press Oxford, pp. 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198858867.003.0001
YAP, P. J.; ABEYRATNE, R. 2021. Judicial self-dealing and unconstitutional constitutional amendments in South Asia. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 19(1):127–148. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moab007
ZAMIR, A. 2023. A Constitution” Without A Constitution: The Israeli Experience. Regional Law Review, 4:271–284. https://doi.org/10.56461/iup_rlrc.2023.4.ch17
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
Concedo a Revista de Estudos Constitucionais, Hermenêutica e Teoria do Direito (RECHTD) o direito de primeira publicação da versão revisada do meu artigo, licenciado sob a Licença Creative Commons Attribution (que permite o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista).
Afirmo ainda que meu artigo não está sendo submetido a outra publicação e não foi publicado na íntegra em outro periódico e assumo total responsabilidade por sua originalidade, podendo incidir sobre mim eventuais encargos decorrentes de reivindicação, por parte de terceiros, em relação à autoria do mesmo.
Também aceito submeter o trabalho às normas de publicação da Revista de Estudos Constitucionais, Hermenêutica e Teoria do Direito (RECHTD) acima explicitadas.
