Differences and similarities between the theories of Rudolf Smend and Konrad Hesse on the fundamental rights' interpretation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4013/rechtd.2017.91.02Abstract
The main purpose of this study is to analyze the differences and similarities between the constitution’s theories of Rudolf Smend and Konrad Hesse with a particular attention to the interpretation of fundamental rights. Beginning with the strict connection between constitutionalism and fundamental right presenting the prevalent ideas in the two theories and at the end evaluate how the theories of Smend and Hesse aren’t exactly opposite and have many points in common, especially on the fundamental rights interpretation. The review of aspects of the two theories may be useful in the difficult task of giving greater effect to these rights.
Keywords: constitutionalism, fundamental rights, Rudolf Smend, Konrad Hesse.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
I grant the journal RECHTD the first publication of my article, licensed under Creative Commons Attribution license (which allows sharing of work, recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal).
I confirm that my article is not being submitted to another publication and has not been published in its entirely on another journal. I take full responsibility for its originality and I will also claim responsibility for charges from claims by third parties concerning the authorship of the article.
I also agree that the manuscript will be submitted according to the journal’s publication rules described above.