Ulysses and the sirens: About judicial activisms and the dangers of creating a “new constitutional convention” by the judicial power
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4013/47Abstract
In the last years, Brazilian law has been taken by a theoretical line that admits and defends the need for judicial activisms to solve political and social problems presented by everyday life. The last attempt was a constitutional lawsuit – known in Brazil as “Arguição de Descumprimento de Preceito Fundamental” ADPF n. 178 (Claim of Disobeying a Fundamental Precept) – proposed by the Attorney General's Office with the purpose of regulating marriage between persons of the same sex. In this article we problematize this issue by demonstrating how such intent would express a serious democratic risk because it has become the judicial review in an everlasting constitutional power, although it is founded on good intentions.
Key words: Constitutionalism, Judicial Activism, Hermeneutics.Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
I grant the journal RECHTD the first publication of my article, licensed under Creative Commons Attribution license (which allows sharing of work, recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal).
I confirm that my article is not being submitted to another publication and has not been published in its entirely on another journal. I take full responsibility for its originality and I will also claim responsibility for charges from claims by third parties concerning the authorship of the article.
I also agree that the manuscript will be submitted according to the journal’s publication rules described above.