Neoconstitutionalism and post-positivism: A critical analysis in cases of tax planning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4013/rechtd.2018.101.04Abstract
The purpose of this article is to analyze how a neoconstitutional interpretation can be dangerous in the area of tax planning. The danger is to believe that the insertion of values in the law provides for discretionary analysis. Hermeneutical criteria will be presented for a better understanding of the theme.
Keywords: hermeneutics, fundamental rights, decision, tax planning, indeterminate concepts.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
I grant the journal RECHTD the first publication of my article, licensed under Creative Commons Attribution license (which allows sharing of work, recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal).
I confirm that my article is not being submitted to another publication and has not been published in its entirely on another journal. I take full responsibility for its originality and I will also claim responsibility for charges from claims by third parties concerning the authorship of the article.
I also agree that the manuscript will be submitted according to the journal’s publication rules described above.