Mobility in European Policies: A Social Right for Urban “Publicness”
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4013/rechtd.2025.172.02Abstract
European cities today face multiple challenges: on the one hand, they are faced with a significant increase in urbanization by 2050, and on the other, they are committed to achieving the complete decarbonization of European mobility and ensuring universal access to urban areas. In this regard, the European Commission has introduced Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans (SUMPs) as a policy tool to support local governments in developing policies that address mobility needs and promote social inclusion. SUMPs undoubtedly originate as policy tools for local authorities, but their development and implementation are entrusted to a complex multilevel governance system that is therefore not limited to the municipal level but extends upward to the point of requiring state and/or European support. From this perspective, municipal policies promote specific needs while respecting broader national and supranational regulatory frameworks and funding mechanisms. This governance structure requires balancing municipal priorities, which are closer to citizens, with global sustainability objectives, such as reducing emissions and integrating multimodal mobility, defined for example at the national/supranational level. This article aims to explore the tools available to Member States to address mobility issues within a multilevel governance framework, in accordance with EU guidelines. The right to mobility presents itself as a social right, raising questions regarding regulatory instruments, laws, tariffs, and border categories that allow or facilitate the movement of some to the detriment of others, clearly contradicting the ideal of a universal and individual right to mobility. At the same time, the increased movement of people and goods has generated and continues to generate numerous social, economic, and environmental problems and costs in terms of air and noise pollution.
References
ALLMENDINGER, P.; HAUGHTON, G. 2009. Soft spaces, fuzzy boundaries and metagovernance: the new spatial planning in the Thames Gateway. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 41:617-633.
BEVILACQUA, D.; CHITI, E. 2024. Green Deal. Come costruire una nuova Europa. Bologna, il Mulino.
BONETTI, T. 2020. Il trasporto pubblico locale nel prisma della mobilità sostenibile. Diritto amministrativo, 3:563-590.
BONOMO, A. 1998. La libera circolazione dei malati. Giust. Civ., 1998:2391-2401.
BULLARD, R.D.; JOHNSON, G.S.; TORRES A.O. (Eds.). 2004. Highway Robbery: Transportation Racism & New Routes to Equity. Boston, South End Press.
CHITI, E. (2022). Managing the ecological transition of the EU: the European Green Deal as a regulatory process. Common Market Law Review, 1:19-48.
CIARLO, P. 2001. La mobilità delle persone tra libertà e diritti costituzionalmente garantiti. In: TULLIO, L.; DEIANA M. (Cur.). Continuità territoriale e servizi di trasporto marittimo. Cagliari, ISDIT.
CIDELL, J.; PRYTHERCH, D. 2015. Transport, Mobility, and the Production of Urban Space. New York-London, Routledge.
COMI, A.; POLIMENI, A. 2024. Assessing potential sustainability benefits of micromobility: a new data driven approach. European Transport Research Review, 16:1-19.
DAVOUDI, S.; STRANGE, I. 2009. Space and Place in Twentieth Century Planning: an Analytical Framework and Historical Review. In: DAVOUDI, S.; STRANGE I. Conceptions of Space and Place in Strategic Spatial Planning. London, Routledge.
FALUDI, A. 2012. Beyond Lisbon: Soft European Spatial Planning. disP - The Planning Review, 46:14-24.
GALLEZ, C.; MOTTE-BAUMVOL, B. 2018. Inclusive Mobility or Inclusive Accessibility? A European Perspective. Disponibile su https://shs.hal.science.
GIUDICI, C.; WIHTOL DE WENDEN, C. 2016. I nuovi movimenti migratori. Il diritto alla mobilità e le politiche di accoglienza. Milano, FrancoAngeli.
HIPKINS, J.; BUSCH, D. 2017. Transportation Protests: 1841 to 1992. Disponibile su https://www.civilrightsteaching.org.
KULOVESI K.; OBERTHÜR, S.; VAN ASSELT, H.; SAVARESI, A. 2024. The European climate law: strengthening EU procedural climate governance? Journal of Environmental Law, 36:23-42.
LOGROSCINO, P. 2008. Governare le differenze. Bari, Cacucci.
LUCAS, K. 2012. Transport and social exclusion: where are we now? Transport policy, 20:105-113.
MOSKOWITZ, P. 2017. How to Kill a City: Gentrification, Inequality, and the Fight for the Neighborhood. New York, Nation Books.
NYS, H. 2014. The Transposition of the Directive on Patients’ Rights in Cross – Care Healthcare in National Law by the Member States: Still a Lot of Effort to Be Made and Questions to Be Answered. European Journal of Public Health, 2:1-14.
PANGBOURNE, K.; MLADENOVIĆ, M.N.; STEAD; MILAKIS, D. 2020. Questioning mobility as a service: Unanticipated implications for society and governance. Disponibile su Elsevier.com, 131:35-49.
PEETERS, M. 2012. Free Movement of Patients: Directive 2011/24 on the Application of Patients’ Rights in Cross – Border Healthcare. European Journal of Public Health, 19:29-60.
PORTALURI, P. 2016. La coesione politico-territoriale: rapporti con l’Europa e coordinamento Stato-autonomie. Federalismi.it, 22:1-31.
PRIYA UTENG, T. 2014. Rethinking mobilities: exploring the linkages between development issues, marginalized groups, and gender. In: LUND, R.; KUSAKABE, K.; MISHRA PANDA, S.; WANG, Y. Gender, Mobilities and livelihood transformations: comparing indigenous people in China, India and Laos. Abingdon-New York, Routledge.
SZYMAŃSKI, M. 2022. Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on the New EU Urban Mobility Framework (COM(2021) 811 final) (2022/C 323/18). Disponibile su https://eur-lex.europa.eu.
VAN DER CRAATS, J.; VAN LIEROP, D.; DURAN-RODAS, D. 2025. Social inclusion in sustainable urban mobility plans (SUMPs): The case of shared mobility in Utrecht, the Netherlands. Journal of Transport Geography, 126:1-16.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
I grant the journal RECHTD the first publication of my article, licensed under Creative Commons Attribution license (which allows sharing of work, recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal).
I confirm that my article is not being submitted to another publication and has not been published in its entirely on another journal. I take full responsibility for its originality and I will also claim responsibility for charges from claims by third parties concerning the authorship of the article.
I also agree that the manuscript will be submitted according to the journal’s publication rules described above.