Truth in the Age of Synthetic Voices: Constitutional and Private-Law Remedies for Deepfake Financial Fraud
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4013/rechtd.2025.172.04Resumo
This study analyzes the emergent threat of deepfake financial fraud, where generative AI technologies allow actors to impersonate others, fabricate identities, and interfere with financial transactions. The objective is to examine the constitutional, statutory, and private-law remedies that are available for this newly developed form of deception that is evolving rapidly. Utilizing recent case law, regulatory guidance, and comparative state and international responses, the analysis assesses whether our existing legal frameworks sufficiently incurred liability on platforms, made evidentiary standards flexible, and enforced anti-money laundering regulations and know your customer requirements. The analysis will also assess private-law remedies, such as fraud, negligence, and misappropriation claims. The analysis acknowledges that there are fragmented, albeit inadequate, responses from courts, regulators, and legislatures addressing the application of deepfakes and its threats, but there remains no comprehensive system to addresses the dimensions of deepfake threats. This study recommends that a collaborative system combining regulatory oversight, private-law accountability and technological infrastructure is necessary to protect private individuals and the entire financial markets.
Referências
ALI, M.; FERNANDO, Z. J.; HUDA, C.; MAHMUTAROM, M. 2025. Deepfakes and Victimology: Exploring the Impact of Digital Manipulation on Victims. Substantive Justice International Journal of Law, 8:1–12.
AMADI, P. 2024. Federal Rules Of Evidence In The United States Of America And The Challenges Of Authentication In The Age Of Deepfake Technology. UNILAG Law Review, 7:308–336.
APOLO, Y.; MICHAEL, K. 2024. Beyond A Reasonable Doubt? Audiovisual Evidence, AI Manipulation, Deepfakes, and the Law. IEEE Transactions on Technology and Society, 5:156–168.
ASADI, F. 2023. Digital Platforms and Intellectual Property Infringement: Exploring Legal Liability for User-Generated Content in the Context of Digital Media. Legal Studies in Digital Age, 2:39–50.
AVSEC, A. J.; MICHAELS, M. M. 2025. Forged Faces, Real Liability: Deepfake Laws Take Effect In Washington State And Pennsylvania. Disponível em: <https://www.mondaq.com/unitedstates/new-technology/1668436/forged-faces-real-liability-deepfake-laws-take-effect-in-washington-state-and-pennsylvania>. Acesso em: 15 ago. 2025.
BARR, M. S. 2025. Deepfakes and the AI Arms Race in Bank Cybersecurity. Disponível em: <https://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/speech/barr20250417a.htm>. Acesso em: 15 ago. 2025.
BRACKEN, M. 2025. Financial deepfake scams targeted in bipartisan Senate bill. Disponível em: <https://cyberscoop.com/financial-deepfake-scams-targeted-in-bipartisan-senate-bill/>. Acesso em: 15 ago. 2025.
BUTTON, M.; HOCK, B.; SUH, J. B.; KOH, C. S. 2025. Policing cross-border fraud ‘Above and below the surface’: mapping actions and developing a more effective global response. Crime, Law and Social Change, 83:1-27,
CITRON, D. K.; WITTES, B. 2018. The Problem Isn’t Just Backpage: Revising Section 230 Immunity. Georgetown Law Technology Review, 2:425-453.
DE RANCOURT-RAYMOND, A.; SMAILI, N. 2023. The unethical use of deepfakes. Journal of Financial Crime, 30:1066–1077.
EDWARDS, C. J.; BAKER, B. L. 2025. Intermediary Liability and Future Challenges for Section 230. The Business lawyer, 80:287–295.
FINCEN. 2024. FinCEN Alert on Fraud Schemes Involving Deepfake Media Targeting Financial Institutions. Disponível em: <https://www.fincen.gov/sites/default/files/shared/FinCEN-Alert-DeepFakes-Alert508FINAL.pdf>. Acesso em: 15 ago. 2025.
FS-ISAC. 2024. Deepfake Technology Poses New Threats to Financial Institutions; FS-ISAC Provides Guidance. Disponível em: <https://www.fsisac.com/newsroom/deepfake-technology-poses-new-threats-to-financial-institutions-fsisac-provides-guidance>.
FUREY, M. 2024. Sitting on a Throne of Lies: Using RICO and Wire Fraud to Hold Politicians Accountable and Demonetize Campaigns that Intend to Defraud. Villanova Law Review, 69:649.
GOLLIN, T. 2025. A Deep Fake Dilemma: The Battle Over Keeping It Real. DePaul Journal of Art, Technology & Intellectual Property Law, 35:1-32.
GUPTA, D. 2024. Generative AI and Deep fake s: Ethical Implications and Detection Techniques. Journal of Science, Technology and Engineering Research, 1:45-56.
JOSHI, V. C. 2025. Changing Dimensions of Financial Services and Banking Regulation. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore,
KAUSHIK, P.; GARG, V.; PRIYA, A.; KANT, S. 2024. Financial Fraud and Manipulation. In GUPTA, G.; BOHARA, S.; KOVID, R. K.; PANDLA, K. (Eds.). Deepfakes and Their Impact on Business. IGI Global. 173–196.
KHAN, R.; TAQI, M.; AFZAL, A. 2024. Deepfakes in Finance. In LAKHERA, G.; TANEJA, S.; OZEN, E.; KUKRETI, M.; KUMAR, P. (Eds.). Navigating the World of Deepfake Technology. IGI Global, 91–120.
ŁABUZ, M. 2023.Regulating deep fakes in the Artificial Intelligence Act. Applied Cybersecurity & Internet Governance, 2:1–42.
MALIK, S.; SURBHI, A.; ROY, D. 2024. Blurring boundaries between truth and illusion: Analysis of human rights and regulatory concerns arising from abuse of deepfake technology. In International Conference Series on Ict, Entertainment Technologies, and Intelligent Information Management In Education And Industry 2024, AIP Publishing.
MASON, R.; CLARKE, J. 2025. Social media as a compliance risk for financial services: Exploring emerging risks and finding solutions to mitigate harm. Journal of Financial Compliance, 8:229-245.
PFEFFERKORN, R. 2019. “ Deepfakes” in the Courtroom. Boston University Public Interest Law Journal, 29:217-245.
ROHMAN, F. Y.; RAFI, K.; GANESHAN, S.; DEEKSHITH, K.; VEENA, K.; VINODH, K.. 2025. The Influence of Artificial Intelligence On Information Integrity: A Media Literacy Approach For Young People. International Journal of Environmental Sciences, 11:1022–1034.
ROMANISHYN, A.; MALYTSKA, O.; GONCHARUK, V. 2025. AI-driven disinformation: policy recommendations for democratic resilience. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 8:1–21.
RYBACKA, J. 2024. The Significance of the KYC Procedure from the Perspective of Banking Institutions in Poland and the Perception of this Policy from the Clients’ Perspective–Based on an Empirical Study. Finanse i Prawo Finansowe, 3:117–137.
SCHARFMAN, J. 2024. The Cryptocurrency and Digital Asset Fraud Casebook, Volume II. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.
SENG, D.; MASON, S. 2021. Artificial intelligence and evidence. Singapore Academy of Law Journal, 33:241–279.
SESHADRI, C. 2025. How DPRK IT Workers Exploit Identity Management Vulnerabilities. The RUSI Journal, 170:74–84.
SHIRISH, A.; KOMAL, S. 2023. A socio-legal inquiry on deepfakes. California Western International Law Journal, 54:517.
SPIVAK, R. 2018. “ Deepfakes”: The Newest Way to Commit One of the Oldest Crimes. The Georgetown Law Technology Review, 3:321-339.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT N.D. CALIFORNIA. Forrest v. Meta, Judgment June 17.
YOUNG, F. 2025. A Deepfake Evidentiary Rule (Just in Case). Disponível em: <https://library.law.uic.edu/news-stories/a-deepfake-evidentiary-rule-just-in-case/>. Acesso em: 6 ago. 2025.
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
Concedo a Revista de Estudos Constitucionais, Hermenêutica e Teoria do Direito (RECHTD) o direito de primeira publicação da versão revisada do meu artigo, licenciado sob a Licença Creative Commons Attribution (que permite o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista).
Afirmo ainda que meu artigo não está sendo submetido a outra publicação e não foi publicado na íntegra em outro periódico e assumo total responsabilidade por sua originalidade, podendo incidir sobre mim eventuais encargos decorrentes de reivindicação, por parte de terceiros, em relação à autoria do mesmo.
Também aceito submeter o trabalho às normas de publicação da Revista de Estudos Constitucionais, Hermenêutica e Teoria do Direito (RECHTD) acima explicitadas.